header with gradient 3
 
 
 Web  Chadds Ford Live 
 
Reader Login
Username:
Password:
 Save Login?
Free Sign-up
Forgot Password?
Reader Control Panel
 
 
Independence of thought and action
Rate This Article:
0
There was positive feedback from our July Fourth editorial, in both written and verbal comments. Apparently there are readers who share our belief that July 4 and the Declaration of Independence have profound significance to this day.

But independence from Great Britain was just one example of the overall human need for independence from an overbearing government. That need continues to this day, even if the mainstream news media ignore the situation.

Ken Sturzenacker, the former chairman of the Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania, recently wrote a column for The Future of Freedom Foundation in which he traces a modern day move toward independence to California in the 1990s.

In Declaring Independence from the Federal Government, he said the 1996 passage of the proposition allowing for medical marijuana was the first shot in the movement. Since then, 13 other states have passed similar measures.

Mr. Sturzenacker further cites that 25 states have acted to denounce the Real ID Act pushed for by former President George W. Bush. Two other states have passed laws that exempt from federal control any weapons and ammunition made entirely within those two individual states, in direct opposition to how the interstate commerce clause is interpreted.

It’s more than just colonies and states that have stood up to government. Jurors also do this, at least in the past.

Several of our guaranteed freedoms—speech, press and religion—can be traced to the process of jury nullification, where jurors vote on the law as swell as the facts of the case.

William Penn was arrested and tried for preaching the Quaker faith to an unruly assembly in 1670. Penn was guilty of the charge, but four jurors voted to acquit, even after being jailed without food for four days.

In 1735, John Peter Zenger was tried for seditious libel after he was critical of New York’s royal governor. Zenger did write what he was accused of writing, but the jury voted to acquit because jurors judged the law to be wrong.

Over time, jurors also voted to acquit people charged with violating the fugitive slave laws during slavery. As a result, northern states simply stopped charging people with the crime, refused to prosecute. Other juries, later in history, acquitted defendants charged with violating the Volstead Act during prohibition and, in time, the era of alcohol prohibition was brought to an end.

Independence works. Keep it. It does some good things.

Comments 0 comments for this article
Google
Reader of the Day